I performed an impromptu social experiment recently. I want ot share
some of the details and a bit of analysis as I think it provides a
useful answer to the question of what to do with one's photographs.
We
recently hosted an informal holiday get-together of neighbors at our
home, scheduled to begin at 10:00 am. While straightening up the house
that morning I decided on something of a whim to incorporate a slide
show into the proceedings. I selected a show that was already prepared
and on line, a group of pictures made in our neighborhood over the past
eight years.
Click image to view the Old Town folder at Google Photos. To view the images there as a slide show, click the three-dot "More Options" icon in the upper right and select "Slide Show".
Before
our guests arrived, I started the slide show running on my laptop, and
then broadcast it via wifi to our flat-screen television located between
the pellet stove and the piano in our living room.
The
slideshow was running when the first guests arrived. I made no
announcement or reference to the show and there was no sound from the tv
receiver -- just the fifty or so pictures being displayed with about a
five second delay for each shot. I don't think anyone gave much thought
to the changing photo display initially; it just seemed a part of the
decor. Eventually, someone asked if those were my pictures (
yes). Later, I was asked about the location of a shot showing some empty planters in a garden (
the courtyard behind the art museum).
Additional comments were made about the photography over the next three
hours the gathering lasted, but the display did not interfere in any
significant way with the group's ongoing conversation. Some people
looked at the changing pictures often and other only occasionally, but I
think most people saw most of the pictures as they were displayed in a
continuous loop.
One of the salient features of my
experiment was the contrast it provided to countless slideshows I sat
through in my youth. Most people whose personal history extends back
into the era of film photography will have similar memories of sitting
in the dark with a wheezing slide projector throwing images on a white
screen, often accompanied by some narration about a recent vacation
trip. Sometimes the shows were entertaining; more often they were
stoically endured. If the audience was composed of family members or
close friends, there might be some talk and banter about the pictures,
but there were not many opportunities for deviations from the script.
The
things that most distinguished the old-style slide shows was that they
had a very linear character, and they demanded the undivided attention
of the participants. The same can be said, in fact, about most other
ways in which still images are offered up for observation. It takes
some willful preparation, some time commitment, and possibly some money
to go to a photography exhibit, to read a book or to watch a program
about a photographer's work. The informal exhibit I mounted in our
living room required none of those things. Rather, it allowed for
multi-tasking and gave the choice for participation to each individual
member of the assembled group. In other words, it was a photography
exhibit that was consistent with behavioral norms and expectations of
the digital age, a Twenty-First Century slide show.
Although
the slide show I presented was informal, it nevertheless required some
preparation. The subject or theme in this case was easy to relate to
for the guests -- they all lived in the area and had at least some
familiarity with the places depicted. That contributed to the viability
of the continuous, non-linear presentation; it really did not matter
much if their attention strayed at times away from the flow of images. I
could have chosen other subjects for such an exhibit from among my
collection of photos which includes thousands of images. It would have
been fairly easy to assemble forty or fifty portraits; pictures of cats,
cars, color shots, black and white images, what-have-you. I think the
thing to keep in mind is that you are a photographer, but you can also
choose in this streaming digital age to be an archivist, a curator, and
an exhibitor.
I have used several photo sharing
services over the years and some of them provided a way to assemble and
display slide-show presentations on line. I use Flickr.com as a place
to display what I consider my best photos, but I don't like it as a
general purpose image management tool. For that reason, I chose in this
instance to use
Google Photos for assembling and presenting my on line exhibit.
I
accessed my Google Photos slide-show with my laptop running the Chrome
browser which can "cast" anything displayed in the browser via my home
wifi network to my television receiver to which I have attached the
little Google chromecast device. The
chromecast
gadget plugs into one of the HDMI ports on the back of the receiver.
On mine, there is a button on the back of the set with allows changing
the tv output to HDMI from the cable or antenna. Some other sets will
allow that change to be made through the setup menu. At the moment, you
can pick up one of these digital streaming devices for about $25. All
of this can be accomplished quite quickly and easily these days. Large
flat-screen tv receivers and home wifi networks are everywhere, and you
can even do it all on the fly with a tablet, or even just a cell phone
and a portable wifi hotspot.